By Scott Thornbury
Academics of English don't need to merely to have a superb effective command of the language; in addition they want to know lots in regards to the method the language works. This publication asks: 'What is it instructor must find out about English with a view to educate it effectively?' It leads academics to expertise of the language via quite a lot of projects which contain them in analysing English to find its underlying procedure. The ebook involves 28 devices, each one containing round ten projects, plus a diagnostic introductory unit. devices commence at phoneme point and development via phrases, words and sentences directly to entire texts. Task-types contain attractiveness, categorisation, matching, clarification, and alertness projects. through the e-book, the language is illustrated at any place attainable from actual resources, in order that the trainer will be convinced that the English being studied represents present utilization.
Read or Download About Language: Tasks for Teachers of English (Cambridge Teacher Training and Development) PDF
Similar linguistics books
- Dictionary of Languages: The Definitive Reference to More Than 400 Languages
- Gramatica de la lengua quiche = Grammaire de la langue quichée, espagnole-française mise en parallèle avec ses deux dialectes, cakchiquel et tzutuhil, tirée des manuscrits des meilleurs auteurs guatémaliens : ouvrage accompagné de notes philologique
- Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description
- Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (Cambridge Language Teaching Library)
Extra info for About Language: Tasks for Teachers of English (Cambridge Teacher Training and Development)
However, sinc e ther e actuall y i s an unlimite d numbe r o f possible sounds , on e mus t restric t th e numbe r o f symbol s use d s o a s to represen t only distinctiv e soun d type s an d leav e "allophonic " variation s t o b e accounte d for b y phonologica l rules . e . give th e sequenc e i n question on e o f th e phonologica l representations/ ηæη/ or /hæh/, has mostly bee n rejecte d becaus e i t i s intuitively absurd . However , phonological representation s ar e stil l theoretica l construct s whic h nee d n o psychologically motivate d support .
Smit h (1973 , 1975) , and Zonneveld (1975, 1976) . In Zonneveld (1976) th e rul e i s formulated a s in (3) . Triggered b y casua l styl e o f speec h th e rul e convert s d into ƒ in betwee n a tense (long ) back vowe l an d a n unstresse d suffixa l vowe l throug h th e (a ) option (example s ar e displaye d i n (4a)) , and delete s d in betwee n a diphthon g or tens e (long ) fron t vowe l t o th e left , an d a n unstresse d suffixa l vowe l to th e right throug h th e (b ) optio n (example s i n (4b)) .
Halle' s famou s argumen t agains t a n autonomou s phonemi c leve l wa s originall y constructed i n orde r t o decid e betwee n tw o possibl e condition s o n a phonologica l description. Since , according t o Hall e phonologica l segment s ar e theoretica l constructs, they mus t b e appropriately relate d t o observabl e data . I believe mos t linguists woul d agre e o n thi s statement . Th e weakes t for m o f conditio n fo r suc h a phonologica l descriptio n read s a s follows i n Halle' s (1959 , 21 ) formulation : (1) A phonological descriptio n mus t provid e a method fo r inferrin g (deriving ) from ever y phonologica l representatio n th e utteranc e symbolized , withou t recourse t o informatio n no t containe d i n th e phonologica l representation .